Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200703031612.l23GCoK25088@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want > > non-BSD-compatible licensed patches: > > How frequently is this actually a problem? I don't think it is common. I didn't add that part, so if you also think it is rare, I will remove that distinction. New text: <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you aregiving the PostgreSQL Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your patch under the BSD license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it will be rejected.</li> -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: