Re: cosmetic patch to large object regression test
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cosmetic patch to large object regression test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200703030321.l233LFS07048@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | cosmetic patch to large object regression test (Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeremy Drake wrote: > Since I have now learned that it is possible to input values in hex in > postgres, I submit this patch to clean up the ugly workaround I did in the > largeobject regression test to try to input hex values. It does not > change the functionality of the test at all, it just makes it more > readable. > > In detail, before when I needed to write hex values, for example > 0x20000 | 0x40000, > for the flags to lo_open, I would write it: > CAST((2 | 4) * 16^4 AS integer) > > Now, I write it: > CAST(x'20000' | x'40000' AS integer) > > which is more like the C and other language consumers of the API, and also > is more obvious what I am trying to do, IMHO. > > > -- > Real Programs don't use shared text. Otherwise, how can they use > functions for scratch space after they are finished calling them? Content-Description: [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: