On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:56:13PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It hasn't ever made it onto the TODO list, which means there's not a
> consensus that we need it.
Such a patch could improve the acceptance of PostgreSQL in shared hosting
environments. Note that a database without quotas can be filled up easily
and the database will stop serving requests to other users' databases.
There is a quota implementation already in the archives but I don't know
more about it than that it exists:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-07/msg00392.php
Joachim