Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200702271910.l1RJAMf23363@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Zdenek Kotala wrote: > >> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any > >> comments. > > > > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with > > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use > > this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar > > interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question". > > > > You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have > bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only > warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it. > > If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it. OK, removed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: