Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200702261550.04899.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sunday 25 February 2007 01:11, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Lastly, who really cares? Does it really matter? No. I would much rather > > Warren (if he has the skills) put some effort into Patch Review. > > That's pretty much the bottom line. CVS is not so broken that it's a > problem for us today. I have no doubt that it could be a problem if we > had different usage patterns, but we don't. It's worth keeping in mind that one of the primary reasons we don't have a different usage pattern is because CVS makes such a thing painful. Given how much of development is done now, I have a feeling that the community might well adopt a distributed development model and strongly benefit from it given a tool that makes it manageable, but CVS will certainly never give us that. > We have the opportunity to > wait and see what will emerge in the SCMS competition, and IMHO that's > what we should do. There are many more-pressing things for us to spend > time on right now than an SCMS conversion. > 100% Agreed. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: