Re: SCMS question
От | Warren Turkal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCMS question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200702240024.19990.wt@penguintechs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCMS question (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCMS question
Re: SCMS question conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:30, Gregory Stark wrote: > The distributed systems sound neat and do sound like they match our style > of working. But they seem like a big leap for a project that's still using > a buggy unmaintained pile of spaghetti code for fear of change. Subversion > is the path of least resistance in that nothing has to change, we can > choose to use new features if we want but otherwise it's basically a CVS > 2.0 with a new name (and active maintenance). The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a SVN repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real time to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would like to try converting the CVS repository of PostgreSQL to Git and try setting some of this stuff up. Does anyone know how I could get the CVS repository files? wt -- Warren Turkal (w00t)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: