Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070220160433.GA12596@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:10:52PM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > > Isn't this one of the big use cases for table partitioning? Sure, but you can't detach that data in the meantime, AFAIK. Maybe I've missed something. If I have 10 years of finace data, and I have to keep it all online all the time, my electricity costs alone are outrageous. If I can know _where_ the data is without being able to get it until I've actually made it available, then my query tools could be smart enough to detect "table partitioned; this data is offline", I could roll back to my savepoint, return a partial result set to the user, and tell it "call back in 24 hours for your full report". Yes, I know, hands waving in the air. But I already said I was having a "you know what would be sweet" moment. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: