Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200702122229.l1CMTmL07000@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Gene <genekhart@gmail.com> writes: > > ... just my two cents. on a side note, would putting the wal on a > > tmpfs partition give you something similar? > > Indeed, I'm wondering why one needs to hack the Postgres core to throw > away data integrity guarantees; there are plenty of ways to do that > already :-(. Hideyuki-san has not explained exactly what integrity > assumptions he wants to make or not make. I'm surely willing to listen > to supporting a different set of assumptions than we currently use, but > I'd like to see a clear explanation of what assumptions are being made > and why they represent a useful case. I am unsure why Sigres is significantly faster than just creating a file system on the permanent memory and putting xlog on there. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: