Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Is this a new policy that after discussion, all patches must be 
> > > resubmitted with a summary and conclusions of the discussion? I can 
> > > certainly do that for you, but just tell me if you are going to ask the 
> > > same from everyone.
> > 
> > No, I am asking only this time because I feel there was too much
> > disconnect between the patch and the extensive replication discussion
> > that few community members would see the connection.
> 
> FYI, in my opinion the trigger addition is clearly useful to Mammoth
> Replicator as well.  In fact, it's so obviously useful that I didn't see
> a need to state that in the original thread where it was discussed.

Right, I know it is useful too, but I would like a layout of what it
does and why so everyone is clear on it.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +