Re: Index split WAL reduction

Patch applied.  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Here's an updated patch that fixes a bug with full_page_writes, and an
> alignment issue in replay code. Also added a new test case to
> crashtest.sh that exercises the fixed bug.
>
> Has anyone looked at this? I now consider it ready for committing, if
> no-one sees a problem with it.
>
> Here's the original description of the patch:
>
> > Currently, an index split writes all the data on the split page to
> > WAL. That's a lot of WAL traffic. The tuples that are copied to the
> > right page need to be WAL logged, but the tuples that stay on the
> > original page don't.
> >
> > Here's a patch to do that. It needs further testing, I have used the
> > attached crude crashtest.sh to test the basics, but we need to test
> > the more obscure cases like splitting non-leaf or root page.
> >
> > On a test case that inserts 10000 rows in increasing key order with a
> > 100 characters wide text-field as key, the patch reduced the total
> > generated WAL traffic from 45MB to 33MB, or ~ 25%. Your mileage may
> > vary, depending on the tuple and key sizes, and the order of inserts.
>
> --
>    Heikki Linnakangas
>    EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

[ application/x-shellscript is not supported, skipping... ]


>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +