Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC] Connect without queries?])
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC] Connect without queries?]) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070206160158.GC26733@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC] Connect without queries?]) ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:10:21AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Mailman is pretty much the defacto mailing list software out there. It > is used in extremely large installations including sites such as > SourceForge. It has an active community. Heck it even has a freenode > channel that people talk on. Uh. MySQL is pretty much the _de facto_ free DBMS out there. It is used in extremely large installations, including sites such as Slashdot. It is also supported by Oracle. It has an active community, and a company behind it. I don't think this style of argument is one I'm going to buy. > of laziness more than anything. Other than that, I see no reason not to > move to Mailman. One reason I can think is that I've had mailman installations brought to their knees by high volumes of mail. At a previous site where we used it and mj, I never had that happen with mj. I dunno about mj2. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: