Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701292132.l0TLWh603258@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Keep in mind all contrib loads into public, and I don't remember any > > namespace conflict issues in the past. > > > > That is beside the point. Of course there haven't been conflicts - > precisely because a single group controls the whole lot. What I said was > that we should behave as sane third party extension authors would, > namely to use their own namespace to protect themselves from conflicts > with other unknown extensions. It's called setting a good example or > eating your own dog food. The problem I see controlling per-user search_path if +10 extensions are instlalled, and you want them always to be available by default. Also, are we going to use per-schema permissions so that the schemas are not visible by default? That _might_ allow us to install more by default. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: