Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070123095937.GA15047@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too ("Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:50:06PM +0900, Takayuki Tsunakawa wrote: > From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net> > > Are you entirely sure that ntstatus.h is where to look? Because per > > whatever docs I've found, that contains "device driver errors" and > *not* > > exception codes. > > Yes, what you are pointing out is correct. winbase.h and winnt.h > should be consulted instead of ntstatus.h. See the the section > "Return Value" in the following page: > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/ru-ru/library/ms679356.aspx > > Furthermore, the message is meaningless for users because they can do > nothing with the information. So, I think the message should say > something like > > child process was terminated by exception %X > This seems to be a bug of PostgreSQL. > Please report this message with the details of the phynomenon to > PostgreSQL developers. > > > What do you think? I think that's incorrect information to the user :-( If the child terminates with exit(1), we will then say "child process was terminated by exception 1. This seems to be a bug", which is clearly not true. Unless you know a sure way of determining if the exitcode is a normal exitcode or an exception code. //Magnus
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: