Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070117081448.7477FDCC164@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows ("Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
> >> I think many people can benefit from Itagaki-san's proposal, and > >> NO_BUFFERING should be default. Isn't it very rare that disks with > >> sector size larger than 8KB are used? > > > > Definitly very rare. > > > > > >> Providing a way (such as > >> wal_sync_method) to avoid NO_BUFFERING is sufficient for people in > >> rare environments. Or, by determining the sector size with > >> GetDiskFreeSpaceEx(), we could auto-switch to not using > NO_BUFFERING > >> when the sector size is larger than 8KB. > > > > I think the second one is better. > > Thank you for agreeing. Then, I hope Itagaki-san's patch will be > accepted when the following treatments are added to the patch and some > performance report is delivered. I would think so, but we definity need to see some numbers that show that it helps. > > A quick google shows some inconclusive results :-)BUt look at for > > example: > > > http://groups.google.se/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/tree/browse_frm/thread/d3288d3b43338b47/ff5e825dd02faff4?rnum=1&hl=en&q=ntfs+sector+size&_done=% 2Fgroup%2Fmicrosoft.public.sqlserver.server%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fd3288d3b43338b47%2Fff5e825dd02faff4%3Ftvc%3D1%26q%3Dntfs+sector+size%26hl%3Den%26#doc_4556b6 4132b3baa7 > > > > This seems to indicate that *Windows* supports sector sizes >4K, but > SQL > > Server doesn't. But again, it could be a mixup between cluster and > > sector size... > > This is interesting. I've never seen systems with a sector size > larger than 4KB, too. On IBM zSeries (which is a mainframe running > Linux), DASD (direct attached storage device) is usually used as a > hard disk. The sector size of DASD is 4KB. So, the current > implementation of PostgreSQL which assumes 8KB sector size is > practically sufficient. > Delivering an intuitive error message like SQL Server is one way when > PostgreSQL encounters devices with a larger sector size than is > supported. However, as you say, auto-switching to not using > NO_BUFFERING is kinder to users. I think both. Auto-switch but log a warning to the user that this was done. /Magnus
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: