Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701121644.l0CGidw14924@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage of temporary files ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Patch to log usage oftemporary files
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 12:37 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The trace probe was incorrect > > Yes, incomplete, no doubt. On that point you were 100% right to reject. > > > and kind of at an odd place. I don't > > think we want to go down the road of throwing trace in everwhere, do we? > > I would like to see a more systematic approach to it. > > I guess my systematic approach was to add PG_TRACE to all new log points > from now on, so we have a choice of which trace/log mechanism to use. I think the right approach is to look at our existing code and come up with places we want them, and add them in one shot. Doing thing in small parts doesn't work too well with a project this size. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: