Re: Partitioning
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070110210931.GY12217@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioning ("Jeremy Haile" <jhaile@fastmail.fm>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning
Re: Partitioning |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Haile wrote: > This seems so much more intuitive and simpler than what is required to > set it up in PostgreSQL. Does PostgreSQL's approach to table > partitioning have any advantage over MySQL? Is a "nicer" syntax planned > for Postgres? The focus was to get the base functionality working, and working correctly. Another consideration is that there's multiple ways to accomplish the partitioning; exposing the basic functionality without enforcing a given interface provides more flexibility (ie: it appears that you can't do list partitioning with MySQL, while you can with PostgreSQL). -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: