Re: [HACKERS] Last infomask bit

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Patch applied.  Thanks.
> > I added a comment about the unused bits in the header file.
>
> Has anyone bothered to measure the overhead added by having to mask to
> fetch or store the natts value?  This is not a zero-cost improvement.

SHOW ALL has:

   log_temp_files                  | -1                             | Log the use of temporary files larger than th

and pg_settings has:

   log_temp_files    | -1      | kB  | Reporting and Logging / What to Log

Looks OK to me.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +