Re: Table relationships
От | D'Arcy J.M. Cain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table relationships |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20070109094113.064bae02.darcy@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table relationships (Curtis Scheer <Curtis@DAYCOS.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Table relationships
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:07:56 -0600 Curtis Scheer <Curtis@DAYCOS.com> wrote: > -> Is there a difference between an address for the customer detail and an > address for the customer? > > Not really an address is an address, it's a matter of specify an address for > the customer master record which basically represents an entire customer > while the customerdetail represents departments within that company that > might be at a different address then the company's main office for instance. Could be that you need another table. Sounds like you have something like; company <===> address <===> detail Now you just have to indicate which address is the primary or head office. You can do that with a bool in the address table. You can even add a unique, partial index to address to assure that you only have one head office per company. Another alternative is to add another table which just holds the address: company <===> department <===> detail ^ ^ | | \==> address <==/ Obviously the address attached to the company is the head office. For departments you can either duplicate the reference to the address table or have NULL indicate a default to the head office. There are many possibilities. Which one is best will depend on analysing your particular business model. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: