Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701062158.l06LwBD03325@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > >> What value is allowing multiple queies via PQexec() > > > > The only argument I can think of is that it allows applications to be > > sloppy about parsing a SQL script into individual commands before they > > send it. (I think initdb may be guilty of exactly that BTW...) At the > > same time you could argue that such sloppiness is inherently a Bad Idea. > > Doesn't it also avoid some network(?) overhead when you have > a large number of small inserts or updates? > > I seem to recall a previous company where we had a major performance > by concatenating a bunch of updates with ";"s in between and sending > them to postgresql as a single command. Added to TODO list: > o Consider parsing the -c string into individual queries so each > is run in its own transaction > > o Consider disallowing multiple queries in PQexec() as an > additional barrier to SQL injection attacks -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: