Re: TODO: GNU TLS
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061231031804.GA24675@kenobi.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO: GNU TLS (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO: GNU TLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very > > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various > > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation. > > That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions" > are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be > interpreted as the same thing. The point, from Debian's perspective anyway, is that they're *not* the same thing and one is an 'additional restriction' while the other isn't. It's pretty clear that the GPL has a clause requiring the distribution of the license associated with the work while it has no clause which requires statements in advertising material. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: