Re: Load distributed checkpoint
От | ITAGAKI Takahiro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061219182412.6492.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Load distributed checkpoint (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Load distributed checkpoint
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > I performed some simple tests, and I'll show the results below. > (1) The default case > 235 80 226 77 240 > (2) No write case > 242 250 244 253 280 > (3) No checkpoint case > 229 252 256 292 276 > (4) No fsync() case > 236 112 215 216 221 > (5) No write by PostgreSQL, but fsync() by another program case > 9 223 260 283 292 > (6) case (5) + O_SYNC by write_fsync > 97 114 126 112 125 > (7) O_SYNC case > 182 103 41 50 74 I posted a patch to PATCHES. Please try out it. It does write() smoothly, but fsync() at a burst. I suppose the result will be between (3) and (5). Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: