Re: effective_cache_size vs units
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20061219083642.GB9627@svr2.hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:56:22PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 23:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > > > Oh, you mean MB vs Mb. Man, it had to be that simple :) > > > > ISTM we had discussed whether guc.c should accept units strings in > > a case-insensitive manner, and the forces of pedantry won the first > > round. Shall we reopen that argument? > > I don't think that anyone is going to think, oh I am using 1000 Mega Bit > of ram. Mb == MB in this case. That being said, it is documented and I > don't know that it makes that much difference as long as the > documentation is clear. Is it possible to add an error hint to the message? Along the line of "HINT: Did you perhaps get your casing wrong" (with better wording, of course). //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: