Re: Operator class group proposal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:44:10PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Operator Superclass ?
> 
> Yeah, I thought about that too, but I don't like it much ... can't
> entirely put my finger on why not [...]

I think I can ;-)

"Operator class group", unwieldy as it is, conveys the meaning that we
are talking about _sets of operator classes_. The nicer terms I have
seen all lose a bit of that ring to me.

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFg4aYBcgs9XrR2kYRAp1mAJ9+ISc7Ex1qCBV2dKgNJSUAOSmR/ACeKt6O
KKp1DI9OkSrlO4VpJbb2xFM=
=KDb3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----