Re: Authoring Tools WAS: Switching to XML
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Authoring Tools WAS: Switching to XML |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200612111127.39155.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Authoring Tools WAS: Switching to XML ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Authoring Tools WAS: Switching to XML
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Josh, > Anything that you produce from a WYSWYG editor is going to have to be > massaged to work with PostgreSQL.Org docs. *sigh* too bad Lyx only writes DocBook and doesn't read it. > > * = an authoring tool is one which makes generation of the document > > easier/faster than hand-editing text files. No such tool exists for > > SGML -- even the Emacs toolkit merely does validation. > > What is it specifically you are looking for then? Because that is what > Docbook is, XML (or sgml) the only thing you need to do is validate. "Authoring Tool" means "not always hand-editing tags". Right now, I can't do anything with Emacs SGML that I couldn't do with Wordpad or Pico, except validate. Let me give you an example of a doc change which needing to hand-edit SGML prevented me from making: I wanted to clean up runtime.sgml by adding an alpha index, and clearly breaking out data like defaults, set time, etc. This meant changing 70% of the document, including some significant re-arranging. After 5 hours of editing, I discovered that I was only 1/3 done ... and that there had been incompatible changes in CVS in the meantime. I gave up. If the docs were WYSWYG-editable or if we had any authoring tool which would automatically fix tags, I would have been able to make the changes and submit a patch in < 4 hours, not 15 hours+ it would have taken to complete the project. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: