Re: psql man page error?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql man page error? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200612060429.kB64Tfa16970@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql man page error? ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql man page error?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > > I think the proper fix is: > > > > > > > <application>psql</application>, like this: <literal>echo -e > > > > "\\x\nSELECT * FROM foo;" | psql</literal>. > > > > > > > I think all modern operating systems understand echo -e at this point. > > > > > > No, they don't, and neither does the Single Unix Spec: > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xcu/echo.html > > > > > > So your version of the example depends on non-standards-compliant > > > echo behavior, which is not better than before. > > > > Well, at least my example works on _some_ operating systems, while the > > previous worked on none of them, so it is _better_. > > > > I can't think of a good way to do this except converting the example to > > a <programlisting> block that will not change newlines: > > > > echo '\x > > SELECT * FROM foo;' | psql > > > > Is that what people want? > > Well, it works, but IMHO its not as clear. Well, it is even worse because some versions of echo automatically interpret backslashes, so it would have to be \\x. I am thinking we should just leave it as I have it now, unless we want to use 'awk' or 'perl' where we know the backslash behavior. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: