Re: psql possible TODO
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql possible TODO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200612052310.kB5NAn106940@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql possible TODO ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 17:45 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > > > > control-R isn't real useful for 17 queries that are exactly the same > > > > > except for 3 different join clauses. It also isn't useful when you don't > > > > > know exactly what query you are looking for. > > > > > > > > ... but, somehow, you know exactly what command number it has? > > > > > > Well, presumably \s would give you the numbers. "history" does on bash anyway. > > > > > > I use it on bash all the time: I do "history | grep something" and then > > > !<number of command I want>. > > > > > > I don't think we can do the "| grep" part, but it's useful anyway. > > > > OK, now at least I understand how it would be used, and could be > > explained easily in the documentation --- do \s, then \! 99, or maybe \# > > 99. I don't like making \! do shells and pull SQL commands from history. > > Yeah the # was the next logical thing. Would we have to escape it? > > \#12... hmmm > #12 Well, it is something that controls psql, so the backslash really makes sense. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: