Re: psql possible TODO
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql possible TODO |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200612052234.kB5MYDn24974@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql possible TODO (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql possible TODO
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > control-R isn't real useful for 17 queries that are exactly the same > > except for 3 different join clauses. It also isn't useful when you don't > > know exactly what query you are looking for. > > ... but, somehow, you know exactly what command number it has? > The above seems completely unimpressive as arguments for adding > command-number-based recall. > > >> What we have is just like bash --- at least the parts of it that I use. > > Yes, and I am trying to add more functionality that is like bash :) > > It's like a part of bash that's been obsolete since readline was > written, and probably would never have existed at all if readline had > appeared first. I can't really picture a situation in which this is an > improvement over the readline facilities. Yea, that was my impression. It seemed so awkward, but so is 'vi' to me. (Me ducks.) -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: