Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in
От | Stephen Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061130213151.GA608@pugwash.spuddy.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:59:15PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Harris <lists@spuddy.org> writes: > > Starting up the standby database still goes back to earlier log files, > > but I guess that's the 100 checkpoint thing you mentioned earlier. > > Actually I was misremembering that: the frequency of recovery > checkpoints is time-based, and for a slave that's in sync with its > master, they should occur about as often as checkpoints on the master. > So the amount of log to be replayed should be comparable to what the > master would have to replay if it crashed. Hmm. For testing purposes I have archive_timeout=5 so an archive log is created every 5 seconds if there's activity. In idle periods it's created every 5 minutes as the internal checkpoint occurs on the server. However if I replay all those "empty" logs then shutdown then startup it will ask for some of them again. As a test, I started a recover, recovered 11 archive logs (000000010000000000000035 to 00000001000000000000003F), some may have had activity; I not sure. I then waited 10 minutes after the last log file had been replayed. Then I did a fast shutdown. Starting the standby database again required it going back to 000000010000000000000035 again. -- rgds Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: