Re: Day and month name localization uses wrong

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > It looks like we have some of the variants marked stable already for
> > their dependence on TimeZone, but the dependence on lc_messages is new.
> 
> Actually, now that I look at it, *most* of the variants of to_char,
> to_number, and friends have been broken on this score since day one.
> There's been a dependency on LC_NUMERIC for the numeric variants all
> along, but they're marked immutable :-(

Where are we on this?  Should I mark to_char as stable?  Seems this
would break pre-8.2 to_char expression indexes.  Do we need something in
the release notes for this?

--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +