Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200611270050.25315.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Just so you all know: I gave a green flag for two magazines (one in > Middle East, one in Dutch) to carry articles about 8.2 for their > January issues, which will come out in December. So there's a > distinct possibility that those magazines will come out and 8.2 still > won't be available. I hadn't anticipated us slipping the schedule by > more than a month. Not that this should be our deciding criteria, > but just so people know that I'm not just pushing the date for no > reason. We have this issue every year and it's never ended up being a problem. It's the author's or publisher's fault if they can't write their articles ambiguous enough. > Also note that if we release between December 18th and January 3rd, > we can pretty much expect no coverage from the press. We also have this issue every year and I still don't believe it. Curiously, there is always excellent press coverage of everything else between December 18th and January 3rd. > Overall, I submit that our release process is broken, and that we're > having trouble getting this release out because nobody is paying > attention to it (of which I too have been guilty off-and-on). I > suggest that we need something different for 8.3, or we can forget > about even trying to do a short release schedule. We also have this issue every year, but the time from beta to release has always been about three months. With the buildfarm helping out, we're a couple of weeks early this time. Rejoice. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: