Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200611180837.34412.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov wrote: > marketing is not always "swear-word" :) We live in real world and > there are many situations where marketing is the deciding vote. I don't know about you, but I market PostgreSQL partially using 1. sane design, not driven by random demands 2. extensibility which would be completely contradicted by moving any module into core for "marketing" reasons. > Not > all are Tom Lane, who could convince customer saying there is no > difference between contrib module and core feature, or that > PostgreSQL is a mature database with fts add-on, which could be > installed separately (with supersuser rights). It's not like PostgreSQL is the first software product in the world to provide a module or plugin mechanism. (It is incidentally the first DBMS to do so.) People who refuse to understand that are idiots, and we don't design for idiots. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: