Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061117120524.GB19153@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 01:15:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > +1 on the idea, but am willing to listen to objections... Well, the objection is basically that SPF records are possibly a vector for large-scale DoS amplification attacks _on the receiving client end_. So they don't affect you, but they cause a lot of processing by someone else. Doug Otis made a presentation about this at IETF67 just last week. It's somewhat controversial -- the SPF supporters claim that the attack is no worse than for any other DNS where one controls the domain. In any case, though, SPF records are considerably larger than traditional DNS responses, which means much of the time everyone is failing back to TCP. Since a number of non-clueful DNS operators think you can block TCP on port 53, it's also a potential way to prevent communication. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: