Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061101221637.GA12381@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k (tomas@tuxteam.de) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k
|
Список | pgsql-general |
tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:55:04PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > >> We are not storing bytea [...] > [...] > > > Hmm, have you tried to create a functional trigram index on the > > > equivalent of "strings(bytea_column)" or something like that? > > Hrm. Sorry for my impolite interuption, but... is there such a thing as > a "functional trigram index"? (this would be very cool). Heh :-) I meant an index, using the pg_trgm opclass (which indexes trigrams; hence the "trigram" part), on a function that would extract the text from a bytea column; instead of indexing the trigrams of the bytea column directly. Hence the "functional" part. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: