Re: On what we want to support: travel?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061101150643.GC25856@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: travel? (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: On what we want to support: travel?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:18:22PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > > ISTM expanding the user base is one of the best things we can do for our > existing users. First, I'm not sure I buy that argument at all. I _used_ to be worried about our user base, but it now seems to me to be growing in a healthy way, attracting exactly the sort of users I want to see: people who are used to serious data systems, working in industry and telcos and the like, who want a system that is comparable to the expensive systems they can buy, except without the big license agreements and with the advantages of code they can see and, if need be, fix. But in any case, how does funding participation in data standards groups, by which participation PostgreSQL can become a better system, not expand the user base? If we seriously believe that an advantage of free software is that it can be better than the alternatives, then presumably avenues to better software ought to be the highest priority. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant- garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism. --Brad Holland
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: