Re: On what we want to support: travel?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200610311141.49051.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: travel? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter, Greg, > > See, I was trying to avoid this because I don't think that we can make > > hard-and-fast rules about priorities by category. For example, a full > > membership in TPC is $20,000 and we'd be unlikely to be listened to > > even as full members. Would you rate that over paying for 15 > > different trips by PostgreSQL keynote speakers to South America, Asia > > and the Middle East, each speaking to between 200 and 3000 people? I > > wouldn't. > > On this particular point, I have the opposite opinion. Can you explan why? I'm not clear on your priorities. Please note that the TPC thing was just a hypothetical extreme example, since as an NPO we can join TPC for $1500 per year. On the other hand, it's a good example, because a TPC membership does us no good if nobody attends the TPC meetings ... which gets us into paying for travel again. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: