Re: On what we want to support: travel?
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061030211352.GF16730@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: travel? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Re: On what we want to support: travel? Re: On what we want to support: travel? Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:59:20AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > So far, the consensus is that our priorities are as follows: I don't see any consensus at all. So far, almost everyone who has had anything to say about this is in fact a member of the funds group. That makes me pretty uneasy. > I haven't seen any disagreement with that specific ranking of priorities, I have: we just had someone objecting to the very idea of either speaker subsidies or trade show booths. And that was one of the only people who are not part of the funds group to speak. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics problem. --Bruce Schneier
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: