Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200610271913.45689.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 27 October 2006 14:01, Josh Berkus wrote: )> Duncan, > > I didn't expect anybody to do a lot of work, but I did hope that > > somebody would point me towards some authorative articles on the web. > > They must exist. > > Hmmm ... I'm not sure how an article would be "authorative", in the absence > of published benchmarks or evaluations by standards bodies, neither of > which OSS DBs have yet. Anything you got would just be someone's opinion. > > > I do appreciate your replies, they made interesting reading. You all > > clearly believe in your product. However, it is a bit worrying that > > nobody on the Postgres advocacy mailing list could point me towards any > > authoratative material advocating Postgres over MySQL. > > Let me see if I can dig anything up. Generally we try to avoid the MySQL > comparison because it's not doing open source in general any good to > constantly have PostgreSQL and MySQL pitted against each other. We'd > rather be compared with Oracle and DB2. Generally I agree with Josh's statements above, but I also keep a few links around of what other people have written for cases like this: http://feedlounge.com/blog/2005/11/20/switched-to-postgresql/ http://www.sitepoint.com/article/site-mysql-postgresql-1 http://www.phpbuilder.com/columns/tim20001112.php3 http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2005/01/cd_baby_rewrite_in_postgres_an.html http://www.leaveitbehind.com/home/2005/03/why_switch.html And of course the following is usually worth pointing people to as well. http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: