Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes
| От | Gavin Hamill |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20061026213556.174bd7b5.gdh@laterooms.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes
Re: VACUUMs take twice as long across all nodes |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:17:29 -0500 "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net> wrote: > Are you sure that there's nothing else happening on the machine that > could affect the vacuum times? Like, say a backup? Or perhaps updates > coming in from Slony that didn't used to be there? I'm absolutely certain. The backups run from only one slave, given that it is a full copy of node 1. Our overnight traffic has not increased any, and the nightly backups show that the overall size of the DB has not increased more than usual growth. Plus, I have fairly verbose logging, and it's not showing anything out of the ordinary. Like I said, it's one of those awful hypothesis/hand-waving problems :) Cheers, Gavin.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: