Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> > I think this is a good reason not to list *any* of the products by name
> > in the documentation, but instead refer to a page on say techdocs that
> > can be more easily updated.
>
> I agree with that.  If we have statements about other projects in our
> docs, we will have a problem with not being able to update those
> statements in a timely fashion when the other projects change.

I mention only Slony and pgpool as examples of replication types.  They
seem to have risen to high enough visiblity to do that. I have not
mentioned any other solutions.

--
  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +