Re: BEGIN WORK READ ONLY;
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BEGIN WORK READ ONLY; |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061014192734.GB15287@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BEGIN WORK READ ONLY; ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BEGIN WORK READ ONLY;
Re: BEGIN WORK READ ONLY; |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:35:12AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > Command Prompt has been teaching alot of classes lately, and one of the > questions that I received recently was: > > What is the use case for a READ ONLY transaction? It would be handy for things like pgpool and Continuent, which could reliably distinguish up front the difference between a transaction that can write and one that can safely be sliced up and dispatched to read-only databases. Cheers, D > I haven't been able to come up with a good answer. Anyone got a use case > for this feature? I know the community didn't implement it for giggles. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > > -- > > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === > Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 > http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: