Re: On status data and summaries
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On status data and summaries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061012185637.GP28647@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On status data and summaries (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: On status data and summaries
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:53:27PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:20:43AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > use a wiki to track open development items, with some status, like I did > > for the open items list for 8.2. I usually only do that during feature > > freeze, but could expand it and open it up for others to edit. > > So do I understand this as a suggestion to pick some threads, keep > track of them, but otherwise shut up until feature freeze? That's > ok with me, if that's what helps; but I was under the impression from > the meta-discussion last time that people didn't think that was > working. Anyone? If the ball gets dropped on something we want to know well before feature-freeze. Something that might be useful would be to send out a monthly status report of all active development. That'd be pretty easy to do if there was a wiki with all the info available.. the trick would just be to *ahem* nudge people to update the status of what they're working on once a month. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: