Re: hstore isexists
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hstore isexists |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061011205719.GS13487@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hstore isexists (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: hstore isexists
Re: hstore isexists |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:17:19PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:04:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > >>Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >> > >>>It's possible to create function 'exists' and mention only it in docs. > >>> > >>Good point. Will you do that, or do you want me to? > >> > > > >ISTM it would be better to mention the deprecated version and > >explicitly state that it's deprecated. > > > > > > If we had had this in contrib previously with the deprecated call I > would agree. But it seems like bad practice and unnecessary clutter to > start off by deprecating something. Sorry, I don't know the history of hstore... but if it's brand new, why are we worried about backwards compatibility? -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: