Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20061008012219.GH9928@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:28:21PM -0400, Gregory Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > The existing patch's behavior is that "the rightmost switch wins", > > ie, if an object's name matches more than one pattern then it is > > included or excluded according to the rightmost switch it matches. > > This is, erm, poorly documented, but it seems like useful behavior > > so I don't have an objection myself. > > I don't know, it sounds like it's the source of the confusion you > identify later. > > My first thought is that the rule should be to apply all the > inclusion switches (implicitly including everything if there are > none), then apply all the exclusion switches. +1 :) Order-dependent switches are a giant foot gun. Cheers, D -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: