Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060925140251.GX19827@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2 (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release Notes: Major Changes in 8.2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:59:36PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:05:36PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > >>Regardless, I think we should include a section of major new > >>projects/developments from pgFoundry, because they ultimately make > >>PostgreSQL a more useful database. Maybe this list should only be in the > > > >I like that. "New enhancement products" or something? "enhancement products" makes me think if Encyte and the like... :P Maybe "add-ons" would be better? > In that case, what about things on gborg too? I just updated PL/R for > 8.2 compatibility (and finally changed the status from alpha to beta). > > BTW, I'm happy to move PL/R over to pgFoundry, but became a little > concerned about doing that after seeing the lengthy thread regarding > pgFoundry concerns (but admittedly, I didn't have time to read the > thread in detail, because I'm back over in Germany on a long business > trip again). I didn't mention gforge since it'd depricated, but I don't see an issue with listing any add-on projects, no matter where they're hosted. For example, didn't pgAdmin just add support for Slony? That's something worth mentioning. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: