Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060923195604.GD24323@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:27:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > To my mind the real problem is that one of the principal output formats > we are interested in is HTML, and there is no dotless-i entity in any > version of the HTML standard. I trust I need not point out again the > difference between "my browser recognizes this construct" and "it's in > the standard". Sure there is, HTML4 includes all of Unicode, thus also the dotless-i. They gave up assigning names to them after latin1, but numerical references are in the standard also (decimal and hex). I created a simple docbook document on my computer with ı and ran openjade over and in the output file it is converted to ı. Openjade knows how to generate valid character references. The input file is attached, I compiled it with the command: openjade -V draft-mode -wall -wno-unused-param -wno-empty -i output-html -t sgml /tmp/a.sgml For dsl file just copy the stylesheet.dsl file in the postgresql source tree. Why it doesn't work in the current docs I don't know, but I think we can rule out limitations of HTML or Docbook. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: