Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060915234456.GA25109@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres 8.2) ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Recommendation of a slogan for (Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Bruce, it looks like your email client is the one > truncating the subject lines? It's not the only one, and as I said, I doubt it's the mail client. I suggest Bruce looks at his "sent-mail" folder and check whether the mail he actually sent has a truncated subject or not. My guess is it doesn't. Just today, both Michelle (I forget her last name) and Martijn van Oosterhout (sorry if misspelled) posted with truncated subjects. I'm not sure why Michelle's first post wasn't truncated -- a guess is that the truncate only happens to replies, not to the first email of a thread. May this have something to do with the processing of the [pgsql-foo] thing? Oh, and I think I just noticed an unrelated bugs. It's not uncommon on the pgsql-es-ayuda list to have the [pgsql-es-ayuda] stuff prepended over and over again, like Subject: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] Re: [pgsql-es-ayuda] the real subject here (which makes the whole business of truncating subjects a lot more annoying obviously) My guess is that with funny subjects (i.e. those that get MIME-escaped), it (the prefix) gets mangled to the point that Majordomo doesn't recognize it, so it prepends it again leading to that dumb behavior. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: