Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200609151402.11228.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave, > Why do we need a CMS? The only part needing some thought I can think of > would be a secure voting area. 1) Secure voting according to the procedure established for the FG; 2) An easy-to-edit content section (WYSWYG CMS or Wiki), including pages available only to authenticated users. (In addition to minutes and internal docments (which could be handled through PGfoundry), we need a CMS so that the team can put together things like fundraising campaigns and the like.) Thing is, we already have both of these things set up using Gavin Roy's code. So I'd see it as a big waste of time for the WWW team to hack them toghter just to save a domain. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: