Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200609151313.42642.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave, Josh, > > going. Anyone who has worked hard towards that aim, or just agreed > > with the strategy is naturally going to want some seriously good > > justification to backtrack and create another new site in the > > postgresql.org domain. Sure, and I agree with the consolidation goal in general. Heck, I wish that www.postgresql.org supported more CMS services so that we could collapse some of the existing subdomains. However, there seems to be a difference of opinion as to what constitutes "justification." Establishing with us that we need an authenticated voting interface, and easy content management for stuff like donor information and meeting minutes, is justification. Members of this list trying to argue that we don't really need any of these things and can live without them goes way beyond justification and slides into "running the gauntlet". It's a very frustrating experience, when one is trying to set something up in time which is already inadequate. > ?? odbc.postgresql.org jumps to pgfoundry. > > Then there is: > > pgadmin > jdbc > pmt > jabber > archives > search Well, Josh, that actually support's Dave's argument. We have too many already. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: