Re: Mid cycle release?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mid cycle release? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200609142301.26533.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mid cycle release? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 14 September 2006 17:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > But on a serious note, the problem I run into is exactly the opposite. > Someone will turn on autovacuum because they thought it was a good idea > and for their work load, it isn't. So instead of creating new and > interesting ways to allow their database to be more efficient, I am > dealing with snafu's created by my own community. > > Leaving autovacuum on will cement the idea that it *should* be on and > IMHO it shouldn't without specific and careful planning. > Clearly it's better to have auto-vacuum on than to do nothing, so why not give our users a better starting position if we can? Otherwise why are we doing things like attempting to auto-set options in the conf file based on system specs? -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: