Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060914142222.GA525@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > I see a bug though, which is that RecordSubTransactionAbort() calls > > GetCurrentTransactionId() before having verified that it needs to do > > anything. This means that we'll generate and then discard an XID > > uselessly in a failed subxact that didn't touch disk. > > Well, it would be a bug except that RecordSubTransactionAbort isn't > called unless the current subxact has an XID. Perhaps a comment would > be appropriate but there's nothing to fix here. > > I think Theo's problem is probably somewhere else, too --- apparently > it's not so much that TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId takes a long > time as that something is calling it lots of times with no check for > interrupt. Could it be something like heap_lock_tuple? It calls MultiXactIdWait, which calls GetMultXactIdMembers and TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId on each member. (heap_update and heap_delete do the same thing). I must admit I didn't read Theo's description on his scenario though. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: